|
Departments |
|




 |
|
____________
____________

____________ |
|
Post an article or
story on Venture Outdoors?
Details
|
|
| |
Backpacking with Children
by Evan Hill
I took my infant 6mo old daughter backpacking. We were an hour
from the trailhead and from there 2 hours to med services.
I've thought about it a little, and it is basically a line that you walk. You
walk it for yourself personally, and you also have to choose how your children
walk it when they are under your care. The line has risk on one side and
personal growth on the other side. Taking acceptable risks leads to personal
growth. As backpackers, we are continual practitioners of taking risks in
exchange for personal growth. Mountaineers and climbers (both of which I used to
be) take greater risks in exchange for (potentially) greater personal growth.
Children are an interesting situation, because they are generally unaware of
risks. As such, you have to be very careful of the risks you will let them take
under their own direction. I would certainly draw a line for my own children
where I wouldn't let them do something under their own guidance where I didn't
think they could adequately gauge risk and make their own trade off decisions
appropriately.
I know that the bar for that has changed over the last few decades. There is an
older gentleman who used to work for me who told me about boy scout outings when
he was a kid in the 60s in Colorado. All of the boys would posse up in the
middle of town on Friday afternoon with their camping gear strapped to their
bicycles, and ride up to grand mesa for a day or two of camping without adult
supervision.
All of the proceeding covers how much risk you will let your children take under
their own guidance, but that leaves open the question of how much risk you will
submit them to under your own guidance. This is a very personal matter. I'm
willing to rely on my own skills to a pretty high degree when it comes to the
risks I will take with my daughter. I know that these risks that I take will
give her more independence and self satisfaction throughout her life. I know
this because my own father took similar risks with me and my sibs when I was a
kid. I remember one hunting trip in AK (I was maybe 6 and my brother would have
been 4) where dad gave me the option of all of us going back to camp on the
trail we had gone out on or bushwacking down to and along the river to reach our
camp. I chose the bushwacking option and it turned into quite a long and hairy
afternoon getting back to camp. Dad ended up carrying us from sandbar to sandbar
in the river itself because the banks were impassable. When I was in
kindergarten I developed a speech impediment due to emotional abuse at the hands
of my teacher (I was a challenging student, and as you know, many teachers
choose to be teachers so they can be big frogs in small ponds). My parents
pulled me out of school and I spent a week floating the yukon river with my dad.
I came back completely self confident with no speech impediment. These kinds of
experiences shaped me immensely and I highly value them.

On the other hand, my mother recently confided to me that she was certain that
she would never get out of Alaska with all three of her kids alive because of
the risks my father was willing to take. I do know that the lower average life
expectancies found in more primitive cultures and in earlier versions of our own
culture were highly skewed by infant mortality rates -- if you could get to the
age of five, your average life expectancy suddenly shot up by twenty years or
so. This suggests in very real terms that it is more dangerous to be a kid.
However, for this statement to be true, you would have to remove childhood death
due to disease as a contributing factor in infant mortality (since we're not
talking about the kinds of risks where kids are exposed to diseases here. third
world travel is another subject). I suspect that if you could remove disease as
a factor it may have only been slightly more dangerous to be a kid. Arguing on
that side of things, we also know that children's bodies, although being more
susceptible to disease, are LESS susceptible to traumatic injury than adults
(they repair more quickly). It is certainly fair to say that kids bodies are
more susceptible to exposure than adults.
I think all of this leads me to the conclusion that I will continue to take
risks when my daughter is under my care because I believe that the risks are
acceptable given the benefits. When she is old enough to start understanding
risk and making her own trade-offs, I will provide opportunities for her to do
so within whatever I consider the constraints of her decision making abilities.

|