CreekBed.org's  Venture Outdoors

 Share Your Outdoor Adventures

 

 

 

Open Space

Departments

Home
Hiking & Packing
Geocaching
Birding
Open Space

____________

About This Website

____________

Test your knowledge of the outdoors

____________


____________

Post an article or
 story on Venture Outdoors?
Details

 

Articles --- News & Announcements --- Links to Open Space Websites

Open space and other ecology issues are the cause for many emotional debates.  We're open to hearing from all points of views.  Send them to us.

Articles

A Day in the Wilderness.....
by mcg mcgdog

The Hunter
by Michael A. Lewis

"It was a dark and moonless night, as nights tend to be, lit only by the stars hanging in their positions of record in the night sky."

Scenario of the Firestorm
by Bill Tichenor

"We got hit with the full force of the firestorm"


Fire Ecology
by Evan Hill

"The point here is that good fire management requires an understanding of the ecology of a given area"

Forests need return to historic state
by
Thomas M. Bonnicksen

News & Announcements

July 4, 2002
FOREST ROADLESS PROTECTION LEGISLATION
Monday, June 24, 2002
DRAFT PLAN FOR LAKE MEAD OPENS AREA TO JET SKI USE
June 9,2002
FOREST SERVICE TO ALLOW LOGGING ON ROADLESS AREAS IN ROUTT NATIONAL FOREST
June 9,2002
Sea-to-Sea Trail
 May 30, 2002
Plan Unveiled to Create New Wilderness Area in Washington State
May 11, 2002
Boxer Introduces Bill to add 2.5 Million acres of Wilderness in California

Submit news items regarding open space issues to space@creekbed.com

UPDATE: FOREST ROADLESS PROTECTION LEGISLATION

As of today, 176 members of the House of Representatives have rallied
to the cause of roadless area protection. The legislation responds to
the Bush Administration's refusal to defend the roadless rule, adopted
in January 2001 after an unprecedented public response.

Reps. Jay Inslee (D-1/WA) and Sherwood Boehlert (R-23/NY) authored the
legislation and introduced it in early June. The measure is in the
form of an amendment to the Interior appropriations bill and could
come to a House vote as early as mid-July. Expect similar legislation
to be introduced in the Senate shortly after it returns from the July
4 recess.

HOW YOU CAN HELP
Senators and representatives will be in their states and districts
over the recess in this election year. If you should attend a forum
or town meeting with any of your congressional representatives, please
let them know how important roadless area protection is to you -- and
that you vote!

To see whether your representative is a co-sponsor and to learn more
about the legislation, visit:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d107:h.r.04865:


***************************************************************
3. UPDATE: ENERGY BILL CONFERENCE AND THE ARCTIC REFUGE
House and Senate conferees met for the first time on June 27 to begin
work to reconcile two versions of the giant energy bill. The House
version opens the incomparable Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil
and gas exploration. The Senate bill does not. The opening meeting
was more ceremonial than substantive; work will begin in earnest after
the July 4 recess.

Arctic protection got a major boost in June when the National Congress
of American Indians, the largest and most influential native
organization, passed unanimously a resolution supporting the
"subsistence lifeways" of the Gwich'in and other Alaska natives.
Among the greatest concerns about exploration in the Refuge is
disruption of the migration patterns of the Porcupine caribou herd on
which the Gwich'in rely.

***************************************************************
4. UPDATES: OFF-ROAD VEHICLES PLAGUE OUR PARKS

YELLOWSTONE SNOWMOBILES
In the face of over 350,000 public comments, 80 percent of which
called for banning snowmobiles in Yellowstone and Grand Teton National
Parks, the Bush National Park Service said, "Nah."

You will recall that in the last Administration, and after a decade of
scientific study, the agency banned the noxious machines from those
two parks. The snowmobile industry sued to overturn the
administrative action. In a negotiated settlement with the new
Administration, the National Park Service agreed to reopen the process
to seek "new scientific information."

PARK SERVICE MASQUERADE
Americans responded, again. Loudly. On June 25, Yellowstone
Superintendent Suzanne Lewis announced the new alternatives. She
claims that only around 100 of those comments were "substantive." She
casually dismisses all the rest as "emotional" or "polarizing," a sad
new milestone of blatant disregard for public sentiment in what is
supposed to be a public process.

It was a masquerade and the agency did what meant to do from the
moment it reopened the process: sacrifice our greatest National Park
to snowmobile industry greed. If there was science in the latest
analysis, it was political, not natural.

The alternative talks about clean technology and "encouraging"
snowmobiles to use guided tours. All of that is eyewash; it's back to
business as usual with a very large B -- and bison beware.

YOUR COMMENTS MATTER!
One response to this tactic is to assume that public comments matter
little or not at all. Another--and better--one is to note that we've
put enough pressure on the agency that it is scrambling desperately to
find a way to brush our comments aside and to give away some of the
best of our public lands to inappropriate uses. That interpretation
argues for keeping the pressure up. The National Park Service's tactic
is a dishonest expedient. The owners of these lands won't stand for
it. And finally, neither will the Congress.

CONGRESSIONAL ACTION IS PROMISING
While the alternative is even worse than feared, it makes a compelling
case for legislation that would do what the National Park Service
lacks the courage to do: rid Yellowstone of snowmobiles. The
response was swift. Reps. Rush Holt (D-12/NJ) and Chris Shays
(R-4/CT) wrote the Yellowstone Protection Act (H.R.5044). They
introduced the bill with 125 co-sponsors on June 27, two days after
the Park Service capitulated. Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) and six of his
colleagues, including Lincoln Chafee (R-RI), introduced companion
legislation in the Senate.

THE SEA-TO-SEA TRAIL – DISNEYLAND MEETS WILDLANDS
by Pandora Rose from The Mountain Defense League

A project is being marketed that will not only have enormous impacts on our wildlands but fundamentally change the relationship between the public and the natural resources owned by the public.  The Sea-to-Sea Trail Foundation has proposed a project that will extend a 140-mile recreational corridor from the Pacific Ocean to Salton Sea.  This large project would link existing paths, blaze connecting trails through both public lands and private parcels to be purchased, and promote commercial enterprises such as horse stables and mountain bike rentals.  The driving force behind the project is that the Foundation will construct Bed & Breakfast lodges approximately 15-miles apart on nearby private land. 

This project is a Trojan Horse that claims to offer a low-impact recreational trail, but, in fact, will use public wildlands for a commercial venture. No CEQA requirements have been met for this new project.  Mountain Defense League opposes this blatant attempt at commercialization of our public wildlands for private profit.  Further, we insist that proper environmental documentation and public review be completed for this huge project.

Plan Unveiled to Create New Wilderness Area in Washington State

Two Washington lawmakers want to create the state's first new wilderness area in 18 years, setting aside thousands of acres of low-elevation old-growth forest and miles of salmon-spawning streams in an area twice the size of Seattle.

U.S. Sen. Patty Murray and U.S. Rep. Rick Larsen want to designate 106,000 acres north of Highway 2 along the North Skykomish River system as "wilderness," the most-protective federal public-lands classification. The last such creation in the state was in 1984, when 1 million acres was classified as wilderness, including the adjacent Henry M. Jackson Wilderness Area.

The area Murray, D-Wash., and Larsen, D-Everett, are calling "Wild Sky" is home to 80,000 acres of mature and second-growth Douglas fir and Alaska cedar forests, with some trees towering 250 feet. The land is braided by streams and punctuated by rocky peaks and granite cliffs and provides habitat for spotted owls, marbled murrelets, bald eagles, cougars and lynxes.

"If those animals are to be here for centuries into the future, we have to protect that habitat now," Murray said.

If successful, the proposal would reclassify land within the Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest, close 30 miles of old logging roads and permanently ban logging, road-building and motorized access for most vehicles except wheelchairs. But it would continue to allow for recreational use by hikers, cross-country skiers, climbers, hunters and anglers and kayakers. The 1964 Wilderness Act defines wilderness as "land retaining its primeval character and influence, without permanent improvements or human habitation."

Murray and Larsen disclosed their proposal yesterday before an audience of about 60, but its future rests in large part on someone who wasn't in attendance: U.S. Rep. Jennifer Dunn, R-Bellevue.

Only Congress can designate wilderness, and with the House and White House controlled by the GOP, making such a large swath of forest off-limits to logging isn't likely to happen without support of the state's highest-ranking Republican.

"The delegation is probably the key most-important element," said Michael Francis, with the Wilderness Society in Washington, D.C. "If you've got a badly split delegation on the issue, it's probably not going to move. That's the congressional litmus test."

So far, Dunn is noncommittal. "She hasn't seen the map," said Dunn spokeswoman Jen Burita. "She plans to look over it after the recess and see what areas are affected."

Environmentalists have gone door to door in her district, encouraging voters to write letters to Dunn supporting the proposal. Environmental issues are of growing importance to suburban voters, especially in Dunn's district, which voted for Dunn and Democrat Al Gore in the 2000 election.

"If it makes sense, and the impacts are light, then I think most folks in her district would be supportive," said Brett Bader, a conservative political consultant. "And frankly, let's face it: Jennifer's taken other environmental positions that appeared to be at odds with the GOP."

Dunn supported efforts to strip Arctic National Wildlife Refuge drilling plans from President Bush's energy bill last summer. But Bader also pointed out that Republicans, including former U.S. Sens. Dan Evans and Slade Gorton, were instrumental in previous wilderness designations.

Boxer Introduces Bill to add 2.5 Million acres of Wilderness in California

In the most ambitious attempt to expand California's protected lands in eight years, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., has introduced legislation that would designate 2.5 million acres of the state's forests, deserts and river canyons as federal wilderness.

The bill is supported by companion legislation sponsored by Reps. Mike Thompson, D-St. Helena, and Hilda Solis, D-El Monte. But rapid passage of the legislation appears unlikely, given that Republicans dominate the House of Representatives -- and they generally oppose additional wilderness designations.

Under Boxer's bill, 77 areas from Mexico to Oregon would receive wilderness designation, while portions of 22 rivers would be protected under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. Two additional rivers -- Cache Creek and the East Fork of the Carson River - - would be studied for possible wild or scenic status.

Environmentalists responded enthusiastically. "This is an exciting day for California," said Jay Watson, the California director of the Wilderness Society. "California has a long and rich tradition of wilderness preservation," said Watson. "Wilderness and free-flowing rivers help define the quality of life here. Congress has passed more wilderness legislation affecting California than any other state, and this bill will continue in that tradition."

The reaction generally was negative from groups favoring multiple uses of federal wildlands, including logging, mining and off-road vehicle touring.

"California already has a sufficient amount of land designated as wilderness," said Chris Nance, a spokesman for the California Forestry Association. "Moreover, we don't believe additional wilderness will be acceptable to the people living and working in the areas where the designations will occur -- mainly because it prevents people from accessing those areas," he said.

Positions on the bill in the Senate and House of Representatives are firmly divided along party lines. "None of my Republican colleagues in Congress has endorsed the (House) bills, but that doesn't mean they won't work with us," said Boxer. "(Passage) will probably be bit by bit, year by year. It took 14 years for the desert protection act to pass."

Thompson, the companion bill co-sponsor, said the legislation probably won't make it through the House this year, "though it could squeeze through as part of a negotiation at the end of the session. "The main thing is, we're going to keep working on it. My district has most of the salmon habitat in the state, and salmon are extremely important to my constituents. To a large degree, the quality of the wilderness surrounding the salmon streams reflects the size of the salmon run."

Republican congressional representatives labeled the bill "dead on arrival." "Any wilderness bill on the House side has to go through the Subcommittee on National Parks, Recreation and Public Lands," said Brian Kennedy, press secretary for Rep. George Radanovich, R-Fresno.

"My boss is the chairman of that subcommittee," said Kennedy, "and he will consider Sen. Boxer's wilderness bill when she introduces legislation to drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Even then, I wouldn't give it a hundred-to-one shot of making it through the subcommittee. In other words, it doesn't have much of a shot. Congressman Radanovich is enthusiastically opposed -- he considers it an egregious imposition on multiple uses, industries and the taxpayers who pay for the maintenance of these lands."

FOREST SERVICE TO ALLOW LOGGING ON ROADLESS AREAS IN ROUTT NATIONAL FOREST


Decision is first of its kind since Roadless Rule, and won't even achieve primary purpose: controlling a beetle epidemic

PRIME WILD LANDS AT RISK
The Routt National Forest in northwestern Colorado near Steamboat Springs, includes over 30 unprotected roadless areas, many of which deserve wilderness protection. Two of them are the targets of this logging plan. The Nipple Peak South Roadless area's 6000 acres include isolated rocky peaks and large open meadows. They shelter 1400 elk in summer, among other wildlife. The Forest Service recently agreed that the area had all the qualities of a wilderness area -- naturalness, roadlessness, and opportunities for solitude and primitive recreation.

To the east of Nipple Peak South is the 36,000-acre Dome Peak Area, with habitats ranging from lush riparian streamsides to sagebrush, through a mixed conifer and aspen forests, with alpine tundra above timberline.

A SPECULATIVE, DESTRUCTIVE PROJECT
The Forest Service recently approved logging a combined total of nearly 1,200 acres -- nearly two square miles -- in these areas. Loggers would use helicopters to remove logs so no new roads would be built. But a significant swath of forest within these areas will be leveled. The claimed purpose of the logging is to limit the impact of beetle epidemics in the area so that future commercial logging may occur.

There is little science to suggest the logging will do much, if anything, to repel beetle attacks by helping to strengthen remaining trees. To the contrary, the extant science indicates that when beetles populations reach such high levels, there's little human intervention can do. What this intervention will without question do, though, is destroy habitat for such wildlife as marten, goshawk, and boreal owl. That led the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to conclude that the "environmentally preferred" method for addressing the beetle epidemics was no logging at all of the kind approved.

The Forest Service itself concluded that the chosen course of action would cause the greatest damage to roadless character. Virtually the only comments on the draft proposal in support of such intensive logging came from out-of-state timber companies.

VIOLATING THE ROADLESS RULE
Logging these two special places would be illegal under the Roadless Area Conservation Rule of 2001. The rule would only permit logging that is confined to small-diameter trees and where needed either to improve imperiled species habitat or to protect forests from uncharacteristically damaging wildfires. But the Forest Service admits that the agency's plan will log large trees, has little benefit for wildlife, and won't protect the forest from uncharacteristic wildfires. This is one of the first projects anywhere in the nation to so blatantly violate the Roadless Rule since it was adopted.

While the Roadless Rule is not in force due to court action and Administration opposition, a bill to make the rule law was introduced this week in Congress. In addition, top Bush administration officials have told Congress that roadless areas are special, that such areas deserve special protection, and that the Forest Service is not logging in roadless areas in violation of the Roadless Rule … yet. Approval of logging on the Routt National Forest makes a mockery of their assurances.

SPEAK OUT TO SAVE ROUTT NATIONAL FOREST ROADLESS AREAS
Please tell the Forest Service to cancel this destructive logging proposal. Send a letter from http://www.wilderness.org/takeaction/?step=2&item=1591 or contact the Forest Service directly with this message:

- The Forest Service should cancel its logging plan for the Nipple Peak South and Dome Peak Roadless Areas on the Routt National Forest. These wild forests are far more valuable FOR their wildness than as a source of logs for timber companies.

- Logging these roadless areas would violate the Roadless Rule, a rule I strongly support. And it would violate top Bush Administration officials' pledges to the Congress that roadless areas are special, that such areas deserve special protection, and that the Forest Service is not logging in roadless areas in violation of the Roadless Rule. Logging in these these roadless areas reduces those pledges to meaninglessness.

- There is little scientific evidence to justify massive logging in the roadless areas. While the Forest Service admits logging will degrade the wild character of the areas, it also admits that logging has little chance to slow the beetle epidemics. That's why the EPA stated that the "environmentally preferred" course of action was no logging at all of the type approved.

- There may be ways to protect high value areas and private property from a beetle epidemic, but this roadless area logging scheme isn't among them.

Send your letter to:
Mr. Dale Bosworth, Chief, US Forest Service
201 14th Street SW, Washington, D.C. 20250
Tel: 202-225-1661
FAX: (202) 205-1765
EMAIL: dbosworth@fs.fed.us

DRAFT PLAN FOR LAKE MEAD OPENS AREA TO JET SKI USE

If a draft National Park Service management plan for Lake Mead
National Recreation Area (NRA) is put in place, you can shelve any
plans you may have had for a tranquil visit to this large desert lake
east of Las Vegas on the Nevada-Arizona border. The agency's
preferred alternative would leave 98 percent -- not a typo: all but 2
percent! -- of the lake open to the relentless yowl of personal water
craft or jet skis.

Please take action through June 26, 2002, *only,* and help block the
plan to turn Lake Mead over to these machines: http://www.wilderness.org/takeaction/?step=2&item=1653

BACKGROUND
In mid-April, the National Park Service (NPS) released a draft lake
management plan for the Lake Mead NRA. Among its alternatives is one
called the conservation alternative, and environmentalists generally
support it, with the glaring exception of its appalling jet ski
provisions.

Even though jet skis account for less than a quarter of the motorized
use on Lake Mead, the agency proposes to essentially surrender the
lake to that use. And this is despite the fact that the evidence
mounts almost daily against jet skis: they are loud, dirty, dangerous,
and completely inappropriate in units of our National Park System.
Much of this evidence comes from the National Park Service's own
science.

TAKE ACTION
There is still time to let the National Park Service know how -- and
for what -- we want Lake Mead managed. The National Recreation Area
belongs to all of us and it should be managed FOR all of us. Take
action now: http://www.wilderness.org/takeaction/?step=2&item=1653

Or send your comments by June 26 to:
William Dickinson, Superintendent
Lake Mead NRA
601 Nevada Highway
Boulder City, NV 89005
EMAIL: lame_lmp@nps.gov

Your own concerns about Lake Mead and any personal experience you have
of the place are important to note. Here are some additional points
you can make about jet skis:

- They pollute air and water, dumping as much as 30 percent of their
gas-oil mixture into the environment unburned by their two-stroke
engines.

- They damage wildlife and wildlife habitat, particularly for birds
that nest in shallow areas generally inaccessible to ordinary boats
but very much accessible to jet skis.

- They amount to only 9 percent of registered water craft but account
for a whopping 30 percent of boating accidents and 40 of boating
injuries.

- While the conservation alternative calls for a phase-out of the loud
and dirty two-stroke engines in favor of quieter, cleaner four-stroke
engines, the shift wouldn't occur for a decade-way too little and way
too late. Four-stroke engines are not the cure-all the industry
claims. They, too, pollute air and water. And nothing about engine
type begins to speak to the rest of the damaging record of jet-skis:
they are unsafe for wildlife and for humans as well.

WildAlert, the community of online wilderness activists!

***************************************************************
For a full list of Action Items, visit
http://www.wilderness.org/whatcan/takeaction.htm
 

Links

Open Space Preservation - San Diego Based Sites

The Mountain Defense League The Cuyamaca Rancho Foundation

Member

www.creekbed.org

Copyright -  Creekbed Websites 2002